FRONT THROAT SHOT CONFIRMATION BY DR. CARRICO & DR. PERRY

FRONT SHOT EVIDENCE CONFIRMED

A Critical examination of the words of both Dr. Charles Carrico & Dr. Malcolm Perry discovered by Harold Weisberg irrefutably proves a front entrance shot to the throat.

In his outstanding work on the Kennedy Assassination, Harold Weisberg uncovered a definitive attestation from Dr. Malcolm Perry that, in this author’s belief, unknowingly confirmed the front throat wound as a wound of entrance.  The words written by Harold Weisberg cannot be any more clear for us.  His analysis is striking.

“As I lead him (Dr. Perry) over those events (the Parkland Hospital procedures with the President) and his participation, what he did and the sequence, he recalled that he first looked at the wound (in the throat), then asked a nurse for a “trake” (short for tracheotomy) tray, wiped off the wound, saw a ring of bruising around it, and started cutting.  In describing the appearance of the wound and the ring of bruising, he used the words, “as they always are.” Pretending not to notice the significance of this important fact he had let the bubble out, I retraced the whole procedure with him again.  When he had repeated the same words, I asked him if he had ever been asked about the ringed bruise around the wound in front of the neck.  The question told the experienced hunter and the experienced surgeon exactly what he had admitted, one description of an entrance wound.  He blushed and improvised the explanation that there was blood around the wound.  I did not further embarrass him by pressing him, for we both knew he had seen the wound clearly.  He had twice said he had wiped the blood off and had seen the wound clearly, if briefly, before cutting.

The official representation and that of an unofficial apologist to which we shall come would have us believe that bruising is a characteristic of entrance wounds only.  This is not the case.  The reader should not be deceived on this or by Perry’s admission that there was bruising.  Exit wounds also can show bruising.  One difference is that exit wounds do not have to show bruising.  That in this case there was bruising by itself need not be taken as an expression of Perry’s professional opinion that it was a wound of entrance.  The definitive answer is in those words he twice used, quoted directly above,“ ‘as they always are’.  It is an entrance wound only that always are of this description.  Thus, Dr. Perry had said again and in a different way that this was a shot from the front.  In context, this is also the only possible meaning of what Carrico had said.”

JIM MARRS PROVES GRASSY KNOLL SHOOTER

Outstanding new confirmable evidence that during the assassination, Lee Bowers saw the muzzle flash and gun smoke!  The gun smoke immediately waffed into Elm Street and was captured on film by the Weigman photos!  PLEASE WATCH THIS SHOW ON THE TRAVEL CHANNEL / and other channels.

Marrs and Baker recreated the grassy knoll shooter (helmet / hat man) firing from the parallel fence to elm street.  Forget Badgeman! THE PUFF OF SMOKE CAPTURED BY WEIGMAN PHOTO IN CIRCLE BELOW & HELMET / HAT MAN SNIPER SEEN IN THE MOORMAN PHOTO (below Weigman photo) BY THE TREE BEHIND THE THREE MEN ON THE GRASSY KNOLL.  Lee Bower view of the sniper is the final photo below.  CONTRARY TO BLUE RECTANGLE COMMENTARY (LEE BOWERS DID SEE A SHOOTER, PUFF OF SMOKE AND "FLASH" (MUZZLE FLASH) IN THE BLUE RECTANGLE!  IT PROVES THE GRASSY KNOLL SHOOTER!

Dr. Carrico / PARKLAND: The movie

In the movie, Dr. Carrico called the front throat entrance wound, "It's a wound." when asked by Dr. Perry regarding the trach incision.

BUT,

FRONT SHOT EVIDENCE #5

A Critical examination of the words of Dr. Charles Carrico discovered by Harold Weisberg irrefutably proves a front entrance shot to the throat.

In his outstanding work on the Kennedy Assassination,Harold Weisberg uncovered a definitive attestation from Dr. Malcolm Perry that, in this author’s belief, unknowingly confirmed the front throat wound as a wound of entrance.  The words written by Harold Weisberg cannot be any more clear for us.  His analysis is striking.

“As I lead him (Dr. Perry) over those events (the Parkland Hospital procedures with the President) and his participation, what he did and the sequence, he recalled that he first looked at the wound (in the throat), then asked a nurse for a “trake” (short for tracheotomy) tray, wiped off the wound, saw a ring of bruising around it, and started cutting.  In describing the appearance of the wound and the ring of bruising, he used the words, “as they always are.” Pretending not to notice the significance of this important fact he had let bubble out, I retraced the whole procedure with him again.  When he had repeated the same words, I asked him if he had ever been asked about the ringed bruise around the wound in front of the neck.  The question told the experienced hunter and the experienced surgeon exactly what he had admitted, one description of an entrance wound.  He blushed and improvised the explanation that there was blood around the wound.  I did not further embarrass him by pressing him, for we both knew he had seen the wound clearly.  He had twice said he had wiped the blood off and had seen the wound clearly, if briefly, before cutting.

The official representation and that of an unofficial apologist to which we shall come would have us believe that bruising is a characteristic of entrance wounds only.  This is not the case.  The reader should not be deceived on this or by Perry’s admission that there was bruising.  Exit wounds also can show bruising.  One difference is that exit wounds do not have to show bruising.  That in this case there was bruising by itself need not be taken as an expression of Perry’s professional opinion that it was a wound of entrance.  The definitive answer is in those words he twice used, quoted directly above,“ ‘as they always are’.  It is an entrance wound only that always are of this description.  Thus, Dr. Perry had said again and in a different way that this was a shot from the front.  In context, this is also the only possible meaning of what Carrico had said.”

PARKLAND: the movie - The Pros and Cons

I got a two for one deal so I watched it for free.  Never would I pay for it like so many others DIDN'T as well!

THE CON: ABSOLUTELY NO FOOTAGE OF DRS. CARRICO AND PERRY AT THE PARKLAND HOSPITAL PRESSER THAT DISTINGUISHES THE THROAT WOUND AS A WOUND OF ENTRANCE ~ WHERE THE ENTIRE CONSPIRACY COVERUP BEGINS WITH THE MEDICAL EVIDENCE!

The PROS: The physical fight at Parkland for the body of JFK.  It was portrayed with a great deal of accuracy except for the secret service drawing their weapons!  DRAWING THEIR WEAPONS! NOT IN A MOVIE FOR A DRAMATIC THRILLER?! Thanks Tom Hanks you apologist!

The PROS & CONS:  The portrayal of Oswald's mother, Marguerite Oswald, is excellent.  No wonder LHO was a basket case to be manipulated at will.  THE CON: The movie made her the face of assassination conspiracy theories when it was shown in the movie at the end of her claiming that LHO was "an agent of the government and that he did not assassinate JFK" a connotation of her words by me.

The PROS: Nurse Doris Nelson portrayed by Marcia Gay Harden was fantastic.  I do not think that Jackie handed her JFK's brain in reality, but Harden showed the compassion of the doctors and especially the nurses at Parkland Hospital that day.  Harden also showed that JFK was wrapped with gauze bandages before the coffin was closed at Parkland and Doug Horne writes a tremendous expose on how the body of JFK mysteriously ended up in a "zipper bag" at Bethesda on its circuitous route to the autopsy table at Bethesda.
http://fff.org/explore-freedom/article/the-af1-tapes-and-subsequent-events-at-andrews-afb-on-november-22-1963-what-was-supposed-to-happen-vs-what-did-happen/ 

The PROS: The "1963" cinematography, props and scenes authentics.  It puts you there in the Sixties with old typewriters, cameras, wardrobes and dress culture and people behavior.

The PROS: Coroner Earl Rose played by Rory Cochrane was tremendous as he tried to keep the body in Texas for a "legitimate autopsy"!

The PROS: The Priest, Reporters and African American workers at LHO's gravesite showing their "humanity" in assisting Robert Oswald carrying the casket to the grave and filling in the grave with dirt.  It is a decency we could all take a lesson from here.

The PROS: The portrayl of Jackie Kennedy was dignified and classy.  Especially the cut aways to the actual footage of her in the days during and after the assassination to the funeral.

The CONS: Sorrels asking for a confession from Oswald as he lay dying on the table.  NO DR. CRENSHAW who took the call from LBJ?

The CONS: The obvious missing frames that were not shown of the Zapruder Film in the movie.

The CONS: Oswald talking to his brother at Dallas Police HQ.  Did he say he was innocent?  How about just one showing of "I'm just a patsy!" comment by Oswald at the presser conclusion I believe.

EMAILS FROM MY FRIEND TOSH PLUMLEE

THESE ARE EMAILS FROM MY FRIEND TOSH PLUMLEE.  I BELIEVE HIS TESTIMONIES AND INTERVIEWS, AND THEY HAVE NEVER BEEN REFUTED TO MY SATISFACTION ON NOT BELIEVING HIM.  PLEASE READ.

6/29/2013

Not to offend anyone, but things are in the wind concerning the south knoll shooter.

Background for you:

The South Knoll theame song, should be to old Gospil  'Dry Bones';     Cathedral Quartet         (google)

http://search.yahoo.com/search;_ylt=Ail8VsoekIAgnNcBNv9HJVi.ulI6?p=The+Hip+Bone+connect+to+the+leg+bone&type=2button&fr=ush-mailn

Well, things are moving.  ...   Tony stand behind what you know to be true...  and I will too.  .... Yes.  Sherry is a fine woman and a good investigator, well respected by her peers.  I too, have been in touch with her and so far the result has been extremely positive.   The South Knoll shooter is becoming an important topic, as we approach the 50th.  This can be attested to by the way and manner some in Dallas politics are trying to block the south knoll info from going public.  

I believe those in Dallas politics are blocking in sinister ways.  I do know from a sensitive source in the Dallas PD, that-- at this moment-- the Dallas political structure is in damage control mode.   It seems Dallas authorities are attempting to,  'duck and cover'  if a very embarrassing situation is exposed, that being the 'south knoll' and its 'alleged' shooter.  If the South Knoll shooter argument is validated, proving conspiracy, then old political scars of Dallas politics and its direct associated with the, so called, "Texas Syndicate" and  LBJ's Austin cronies, and the Chicago mob, dating from the forties through the 70'swould be documented and exposed for all to see.  As long as the main focus is on the federal government then Dallas is happy.

However, if certain information did get out into the mainstream media, serious question would be asked, "Who was the second shooter?"  'Where did he come from?'  'Who sent him?'  'Was he connected to Texas and Dallas politics, or direct from Chicago?'  'Was he army Intel operative from Florida?'  'Who in FBI worked Dallas politics?' These questions would lead to other questions, all a very embarrasing situation for old Dallas fathers and its 'new' current political structure. 

The old song "The Hip Bone Connected to the Leg Bone-- the Leg Bone connected to the ...." type analogy, perhaps would apply.  Heads would roll in Texas politics, starting with Dallas and into the federal level. It would spread like wildfires.  Now thats conspiracy talk, I know and I am not a conspiracy nut, as you know.  However, the South Knoll shooter could be the key that takes the  assassination of JFK in a whole different direction and ball game.  Of course the breed of researchers in the JFK cult community of today would never allow that to happen.  However, truth would trump that card.

Anyway... no big deal... you can use what you like in you blog concerning me.  The sooner this south knoll matter can be exposed and documented the better and safer for me.. it proves my past comments and postings and today that past information does protect me to some degree.  If I played a part in that and you feel-- in inside your being--then for the sake of truth print it.., so be it.  I'm ready for 'UM'.  

A good read today is Hit List by David Wayne and Richard Belzer, spring 2013.  It does cover a little background on Dallas PD' secret tactical unit of the 50's and 60's and Tippit.

Be safe.        later, Tosh

6/30/2013

Tony. I have a few ideas for you that might help your project along.   What is your location?  Perhaps we can get together, that is if we are in the same area.  Anyway, If we can't get together then perhaps you can post some of the technical info I sent you in previous emails on your blog. You can use my name, if you think it would help.  However, tying in with me or this story will perhaps NOT help your credibility unless others come on board who know or feel they are dealing with truth and who know when this story and information was first presented to the public.  

This story of the south knoll has to be crushed into oblivion by the powers that be, for the sake of "National Security' .  By going public, we could then see who and what we flush out.  Its a long shot, but I feel its time, before I croak, for this story to come out from a source who "ALLEGEDLY", as they say, claims he was there on the south knoll that day. The JFK and the big 50 needs new material.  The old confusing ways and out right lies, are not working anymore. The proof is in the details and the documented, the 'before the fact' information which has been in the public domain for many years; presented by Plumlee and others. 

These facts concerning the 'south knoll shooter' were documented and presented before the fact long ago.  This was detailed info presented to law enforcement and the Senate, from a witness who 'allegedly' saw the President killed before his eyes.  I think if the info and timelines and secret classifications dates are established and the background info looked at objectively, in place of trying to destroy and discredit the source of the information, then that information would prove conspiracy and lead to the who's, whats, and whys in the JFK assassination.  Of course there are many who do not want to see this happen.  Some of these people are from the private sector as well as the State and Federal levels. The ego motivated maniacs, the  so called, 'JFK researcher community'  who play with wild, unsubstantiated, theories and rumors in hopes of establishing them as facts, use this story and others only for monetary gain in place of truth., some plant these falsehoods as factual. This is done  by various federal agency and personal.

 I respect the work of those who have taken up the challenge of the South Knoll Shooter.  I'm thinking about an article or a series of articles, title "That Day"...subtitle 'The military and CIA's Top Secret Operations in Dallas, 1963".  Its time to promote the fiction novel "Deep Cover Shallow Graves". The reason its fiction is because of National Security classified information, if done in first person, they would hang my ass. I can't release this information because it would be considered as "self serving" and done only to make money. That is not the case. I've never made a dime off this story, nor intend to.  Keep in mind, those who do come out and publicly support the south knoll event will also be discredited by the powers that be. 

 I would like to get a consensus and opinions from those who do support this south knoll shooters concept and go head to head with those, 'insiders', who want to bury the truth of that day in order to protect their political careers, or their heritage.   Its time.  And too, at this late date, it would perhaps protect me to some extent, because if something did happen to me, then the info before the fact would stand up and confirm the story and the events of that day.  Perhaps a petition would be in order as a test to see if there is interest.  Just a thought.

I feel if this story is released to the public, in the right format, then that will unravel the threads that will force the truth of that day to the surface for all to see.  Perhaps your work and others in this direction could be instrumental in balancing justice and truth.

Well.  Back to the Book, Deep Cover Shallow Graves.  Its coming along, although slow in spots.  Some of these chapters are really complicated and hard to write and tie in into a coherent, intelligent manner .  I'm still a little to close to all this and sometimes have to force myself to stay focus and write objectively.  However, I am trying to stay d factual, although in the fiction venue.  I hope you understand.

Your Thoughts?     later Tosh.

p.s.  ... you can post this email and others on you blog as sort of a notice, a teaser as to what might be coming down the pike, soon.  I think this approach might flush out some top players in the coverup as well as those who will attack the work.  Thats a 'gimmy'.